|
Tag:Panthers
Posted on: February 21, 2010 6:36 pm
3-2-1 Point System (3rd Quarter)Hello again, another update on the 3-2-1 Point System. For the history of this thread, check out the following links.
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter To begin with, I'll show the current point system standings, and follow it up with the 3-2-1 Point System. Current Point System Eastern Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 62 90 Washington Capitals 02 61 77 New Jersey Devils 03 63 76 Ottawa Senators 04 62 76 Pittsburgh Penguins 05 60 75 Buffalo Sabres 06 60 67 Philadelphia Flyers 07 60 65 Boston Bruins 08 63 64 Montreal Canadiens 09 61 63 New York Rangers 10 61 63 Tampa Bay Lightning 11 60 62 Atlanta Thrashers 12 63 58 New York Islanders 13 61 58 Florida Panthers 14 61 55 Carolina Hurricanes 15 61 49 Toronto Maple Leafs Western Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 62 89 San Jose Sharks 02 61 87 Chicago Blackhawks 03 61 76 Vancouver Canucks 04 63 79 Phoenix Coyotes 05 61 78 Los Angeles Kings 06 61 76 Colorado Avalanche * 07 61 71 Nashville Predators 08 62 69 Calgary Flames 09 61 68 Detroit Red Wings 10 61 68 Dallas Stars 11 62 67 Anaheim Mighty Ducks 12 62 65 St. Louis Blues 13 61 64 Minnesota Wild 14 63 60 Columbus Blue Jackets 15 61 44 Edmonton Oilers 3-2-1 Point System Eastern Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 62 122 Washington Capitals 02 63 107 Ottawa Senators 03 61 107 New Jersey Devils 04 60 102 Buffalo Sabres 05 62 102 Pittsburgh Penguins 06 60 95 Philadelphia Flyers 07 61 85 New York Rangers 08 63 84 Montreal Canadiens 09 61 83 Tampa Bay Lightning 10 60 82 Boston Bruins 11 60 79 Atlanta Thrashers 12 61 75 Florida Panthers 13 61 73 Carolina Hurricanes 14 63 73 New York Islanders 15 61 58 Toronto Maple Leafs Western Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 62 120 San Jose Sharks 02 61 120 Chicago Blackhawks 03 61 110 Vancouver Canucks 04 63 108 Phoenix Coyotes 05 61 107 Los Angeles Kings 06 61 105 Colorado Avalanche 07 61 97 Nashville Predators 08 62 92 Calgary Flames 09 61 90 Minnesota Wild 10 62 90 Anaheim Mighty Ducks 11 61 88 Detroit Red Wings 12 61 88 Dallas Stars 13 62 83 St. Louis Blues 14 63 82 Columbus Blue Jackets 15 61 56 Edmonton Oilers The next (last) quarter I will really break things down so that people can adjust the scores for their own point systems. I will do this as I know that a lot of people seem to disagree with my 'Overtime opinion' where I include the 5 minute overtime in the 3 point win section. * Not sure why this isn't linking properly.
Category: NHL
Tags: 3-2-1 Point System, Avalanche, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, Blues, Bruins, Canadiens, Canucks, Capitals, Coyotes, Devils, Ducks, Flames, Flyers, Hurricanes, Islanders, Kings, Lightning, Maple Leafs, Oilers, Panthers, Penguins, Predators, Rangers, Red Wings, Sabres, Senators, Sharks, Standings, Stars, Thrashers, Wild
Posted on: January 2, 2010 7:02 pm
3-2-1 Point System (2nd Quarter)For the story behind this, check my first "3-2-1 Point System" post at the link below:
Category: NHL
Tags: 3-2-1 Point System, Avalanche, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, Blues, Bruins, Canadiens, Canucks, Capitals, Coyotes, Devils, Ducks, Flames, Flyers, Hurricanes, Islanders, Kings, Lightning, Maple Leafs, Oilers, Panthers, Penguins, Predators, Rangers, Red Wings, Sabres, Senators, Sharks, Standings, Stars, Thrashers, Wild
Posted on: December 4, 2009 6:08 am
Swing a big stick...In the World Hockey Championships of 2009, Tomas Surovy and the Slovakians were down 7-0 to the Czech Republic when Jaroslav Halak replaced the starter (Lasak). The Czech's decided that 7 wasn't enough, and before too long scored an eighth goal on the Slovaks. This was very unfortunate for Halak, as his teammate Surovy had apparently had enough. He swung his stick in frustration at the goal post, missed and struck Halak in the back of the head. Luckily for both players, the stick glanced off Halak's helmet, and Surovy was able to skate around the back of the net and take another good hard shot at it with his stick. See the video for this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0emzMJ6FiwQ&feature=related Earlier this week in a game against the Atlanta Thrashers, Keith Ballard of the Florida Panthers decided the Surovy may have been onto something, and after Ilya Kovalchuk scored a go ahead goal midway through the first period he gave it a shot. Ballard two-handed goaltender Tomas Vokoun in the side of the head, lacerating his inner ear. Vokoun had to be removed from the game on a stretcher. Ballard, who was likely just aiming for the post and not trying to take Vokoun's head off, hit his goalie in the head and then proceeded to take another swing at the post, this time hitting his mark. He then skated off the ice without even stopping to make sure that Vokoun was alright. I mean, why would he, Vokoun was only laid out in the net just seconds after being struck in the head with the stick that Ballard hit him with. See the video for this one here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAdyZFfFehc Now, I have heard many people defend Ballard for just being 'passionate' about the game and showing his frustration by trying to bang it out on the post. But why does that justify this action? In my opinion, it doesn't. Have passion for that game, but don't be a poor sport about losing (or missing coverage as was likely what was going on in his head when he hit Vokoun) and don't EVER swing your stick anywhere near another players head. The very next game, Ballard decided that he needed to make up for hurting Vokoun (his own goaltender) and decided to take a run at the opposing goaltender. In the game against the Colorado Avalanche, Ballard took a run at Craig Anderson late in the overtime period. According to the commentators in the game, Ballard was flying in on a rush on his backhand and 'lost his edge' and ran into Anderson. Watching the replay, anyone who know about momentum knows that Ballard's upper body betrays certain laws of physics had he simply just lost an edge. If you watch the view from behind the net, it is clear that Ballard's upper body moves towards the goaltender when he is said to have lost his edge going around the net. Despite the best efforts of the FSFlorida commentators to sway all blame away from Ballard, my unbiased opinion (I could care less about either team to be honest) leans towards a deliberate act on Ballard's part to get into Anderson, throw him off his game, or possibly remove him from the game. See the video for this one here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQcvo43hC9k And for the record, Anderson had to leave the game, Colorado put Peter Budaj in for the last 45 seconds of overtime and the shootout, Budaj put up a good fight, but came out with the shootout loss. Posted on: November 20, 2009 6:24 pm
3-2-1 Point System (1st Quarter)I am not, and never have been a fan of the 'shootout' to resolve an NHL game. I know I am not alone in this dislike of the 'breakaway relay' but the league seems to be pretty adamant about keeping it around. One of the reasons I dislike the SO is that a team winning in this manner attains the same value of points as a team winning in 60 minutes. And the team losing in this manner still gains a point. The league is giving away 3 points on some games and 2 points on others. So points totals appear bloated, with teams who have lost a lot of close games edging out teams who have won more games. A greater number of wins should count for a higher standing than a team who loses in overtime a lot, at least in my opinion.
So I have been keeping track of the wins/losses for the last couple seasons using a point system that I feel favours teams who actually win more. I refer to it as a 3-2-1 point system, as the title implies. This point system would see a team winning in regular time or over time receiving 3 points for their effort. A team winning in the shootout would receive 2 points, while the team losing in shootout would receive a single point. Losses in regulation or overtime would be worth zero points. Now, a lot of people may argue with me including the 5 minute overtime in the pure win/loss category, but it wasn't that long ago that a loss in overtime was actually a loss and you got zero points. I personally feel that that is a loss in regular season, just as it would be in play-offs. So, now how does this affect the teams this season (2009-2010) up to this point, being approximately one quarter of the way through the season? So first I'll post the current standing, by conference with division leaders at the top. Eastern Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 21 30 Washington Capitals 02 20 29 New Jersey Devils 03 18 25 Buffalo Sabres 04 22 28 Pittsburgh Penguins 05 18 25 Philadelphia Flyers 06 21 23 New York Rangers 07 19 23 Ottawa Senators 08 21 23 New York Islanders 09 19 23 Tampa Bay Lightning 10 18 22 Atlanta Thrashers 11 21 22 Boston Bruins 12 21 20 Montreal Canadiens 13 19 18 Florida Panthers 14 21 13 Carolina Hurricanes 15 20 12 Toronto Maple Leafs Western Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 23 32 San Jose Sharks 02 22 29 Colorado Avalanche 03 20 28 Chicago Blackhawks 04 23 28 Los Angeles Kings 05 20 26 Columbus Blue Jackets 06 20 26 Calgary Flames 07 22 25 Phoenix Coyotes 08 21 24 Dallas Stars 09 20 23 Nashville Predators 10 19 23 Detroit Red Wings 11 21 22 Vancouver Canucks 12 22 21 Edmonton Oilers 13 19 18 St. Louis Blues 14 20 17 Anaheim Mighty Ducks 15 21 16 Minnesota Wild Now in the 3-2-1 point system, with the same layout as above. And as you'll see, not a lot of major differences overall. The teams that it most affects are teams that would be fighting for playoff spots, teams like the New York Islanders and the Dallas Stars. Each of those teams would be out of their 8th place rankings in the current system because the 3-2-1 system doesn't reward them as heavily for their SO and OT performances. Each of those teams has a SO win, 4 SO losses and a couple of OT losses, which would add up to a lot of extra points in the current system (9 of 16 possible points for NYI and 8 of 14 possible points for DAL). But in the 3-2-1 system which favours wins, those games would only account for 6 points for either team (out of a possible 24 for NYI and 21 for DAL). Eastern Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 20 40 New Jersey Devils 02 21 38 Washington Capitals 03 18 34 Buffalo Sabres 04 22 38 Pittsburgh Penguins 05 18 35 Philadelphia Flyers 06 21 32 New York Rangers 07 19 31 Ottawa Senators 08 18 31 Atlanta Thrashers 09 19 28 Tampa Bay Lightning 10 21 27 New York Islanders 11 21 27 Boston Bruins 12 21 26 Montreal Canadiens 13 19 22 Florida Panthers 14 21 12 Carolina Hurricanes 15 20 11 Toronto Maple Leafs Western Conference Pos GP Pts Team 01 23 43 San Jose Sharks 02 22 40 Colorado Avalanche 03 20 39 Chicago Blackhawks 04 23 39 Los Angeles Kings 05 20 36 Calgary Flames 06 20 36 Columbus Blue Jackets 07 22 34 Phoenix Coyotes 08 20 32 Nashville Predators 09 19 31 Detroit Red Wings 10 21 31 Vancouver Canucks 11 21 30 Dallas Stars 12 22 28 Edmonton Oilers 13 19 23 St. Louis Blues 14 21 22 Minnesota Wild 15 20 22 Anaheim Mighty Ducks I'll be re-addressing this at about the half way point in the season as well, and will likely break it up a little differently to show the individual team records for better illustration of the point.
Category: NHL
Tags: 3-2-1 Point System, Avalanche, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, Blues, Bruins, Canadiens, Canucks, Capitals, Coyotes, Devils, Ducks, Flames, Flyers, Hurricanes, Islanders, Kings, Lightning, Maple Leafs, Oilers, Panthers, Penguins, Predators, Rangers, Red Wings, Sabres, Senators, Sharks, Standings, Stars, Thrashers, Wild
Posted on: November 13, 2009 12:15 am
The shutout lossTim Thomas was 'perfect' tonight, stopping all 23 shots that Nathan Horton and the Panthers threw at him. He played the entire game, 65 minutes and the shootout. And he lost in that shootout, but his goals against will read 0.00 for the night. His save percentage will read 1.000 for the night. He will receive a shutout statistic for his effort. And he will also receive a loss for that same shutout effort. There are many reasons why I don't like the shootout, today I want to focus on this one - invisibility.
The Bruins and the Panthers played 65 minutes of good strong hockey. Some may say that Boston outplayed Florida, almost doubling their shots. But Tomas Vokoun played an amazing game, and kept Florida in it. After 65 minutes no points had been recorded, both goalies has shutouts, and they were off to the shootout. In the shootout, there was 1 goal scored through 8 shooters. That goal was scored by Cory Stillman, but you can forget that fact, because he won't even get credit for it. It has become 'invisible'. Oh, Florida will get +1 goal for in their teams stats, and Boston will get +1 goal against in their team stats, but no player will ever show having scored that goal, or having that goal scored against them. Vokoun gets the shutout, and the win. Thomas gets a shutout, and a loss. And Stillman gets third star, and the praise of his team for being the only guy to put the puck in the net tonight. And the score goes in the books as 1-0, but nobody got a point. So, both goalies get shutouts, and nobody got a point. Sounds like a tie to me... |
|